Simple and Sustainable Forums: Central banks should move early on bubbles: RBA - Simple and Sustainable Forums

Jump to content

Please keep the discussion civil and constructive. Only regular members can post in this forum.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Central banks should move early on bubbles: RBA yeah you should...

#1 User is offline   Bullshark 

  • Aspirant
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 196
  • Joined: 27-December 09
  • LocationBayside Melbourne

Posted 09 February 2010 - 06:04 AM

Quote

Central banks should move early on bubbles: RBA

February 9, 2010 - 4:34PM

Central banks may need to become more pro-active in dealing with dangerous asset bubbles before they become destabilising to the financial system, the Reserve Bank said today. In a paper co-authored by RBA Governor Glenn Stevens, the central bank argued that keeping official interest rates too low for too long could inadvertently fuel imbalances that would lead to asset price bubbles.

At a conference to mark the Reserve Bank's 50th anniversary attended by central bankers from around the world, Mr Stevens said central banks had to be wary of waiting too long during a boom cycle to curb imbalances. "It also amounts to an argument to avoid having the boom get to that point and to err on the side, much earlier in the process, of not keeping interest rates unusually low," Mr Stevens told the closed-door conference in his speech, a copy of which was released to the media.

The problem was not solely asset prices, but the imbalances reflected in a combination of rapidly rising asset prices and credit and falling lending standards, he argued. "It is unlikely to be credible for central banks not to move, in the next decade, at least somewhat in the 'responsive' direction," Stevens said.

He was addressing a meeting attended by top officials from the European Central Bank, the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan and other Asian central banks. First mover Australia was the first among industrialised nations last year to begin lifting interest rates from emergency lows, in part wary of fuelling another housing bubble.

The RBA has long challenged the prevailing view among central banks that they should not target asset prices and rather mop up the damage from bubbles afterward. In 2002 and 2003, it nudged up interest rates and was effective in talking down a frothy housing market. The US Federal Reserve's policy of keeping official rates low after the last downturn has been widely blamed for fuelling the US housing debacle that led to the global financial crisis.

The Fed took the view that since it was hard to identify asset bubbles in the making, it was best to let asset markets play out and "clean up" the fall-out after the boom ended. But as major central banks have found in the wake of the crisis, cleaning up afterwards is difficult when interest rates have been slashed close to zero.

One argument against interfering with asset prices is based on the belief that it is too hard to judge excessive growth, but the RBA chief said policymakers routinely faced these kinds of difficulties in judging the risks to inflation and growth. Bank for International Settlements head Jaime Caruana, speaking at the same event, echoed the point that central banks need to play a greater role in ensuring financial stability.

According to a copy of his speech, Caruana noted that debt-fuelled asset bubbles can feed off cheap money. "In general, prudential policies do not suffice to maintain financial stability," he said. "This being the case, regulation would be overburdened without some help from monetary policy."


http://www.theage.co...00209-np7e.html
You've been warned Australia - anytime they see a bubble they're gonna pop it, lucky we don't have any of those nasty bubbles around here eh... cos they'd totally pop it in its tracks they would!

This post has been edited by Bullshark: 09 February 2010 - 06:05 AM

0

#2 User is offline   satanoperca 

  • Dilettante
  • PipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 96
  • Joined: 28-November 09

Posted 09 February 2010 - 07:45 AM

Unfortunately I can never see this happening unless we see a total collapse of the world banking system.

It is all talk to keep the masses at bay and would be political suicide if they did.

Sorry FHB of 2009, we the govnuts created a bubble and now the RBA is going to squash it. Do apologise that the home you bought in 2009 for $400K on 10% deposit in now only worth $360K. Whats that, you are in a 100% debt, we do need to pop this bubbles.

They may and I say may be able to slowly let it down without the masses crying out in pain and realising they have losts money but restricting credit to limit growth for the next 5 years while wages catchup. No, just a fantasy.

Cheers
0

#3 User is offline   boz 

  • Inimitable
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 1,119
  • Joined: 17-January 10
  • Locationmelbourne

Posted 09 February 2010 - 09:35 AM

good word from Stevens, but reality is much harder to see, why Stevens don't clearly say what he think it is in a bubble or it is not?
I like the point of EU governor Trichet:

Quote

SYDNEY (MNI) - The recent financial crisis has demonstrated that central banks need to monitor global, not just local or regional, monetary and credit trends, Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the Europen Central Bank, said at a seminar here.

According to remarks published on the Reserve Bank of Australia's website, Trichet reinforced the need for central banks to stick to their course of price stability over the medium term.

"Keeping inflation expectations anchored remains of paramount importance, under exceptional circumstances even more than in normal times," he said.

But he suggested they may need to beef up their monitoring of monetary and credit issues.

"Experience has shown that ongoing financial innovation makes the interpretation of the monetary data particularly challenging. Therefore, we are continuously seeking to sharpen and deepen our understanding of monetary and financial developments," he said.

He noted ECB research about how asset price booms and busts, and associated financial crises, are global in nature.

"This suggests that there should be global concern over the monetary and credit developments that underpin these episodes. Not surprisingly, recent ECB research suggests that global variables -- rather than only national or regional indicators -- can enhance our ability to identify a build-up of financial imbalances," Trichet said.

He added that he wanted to "raise awareness in the central banking community of the importance of monetary analysis and its implications, both for economies individually and globally."



My link
I like the idea of controlling money supply and inflation with it, after all that is a very clear indicator banks can monitor. in my opinion targeting and vauating growth is like targeting and valuating assets prices
0

#4 User is offline   wulfgar 

  • Inimitable
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 1,186
  • Joined: 04-October 09

Posted 09 February 2010 - 05:53 PM

Of course asset prices are be included only when they are ready to fall through the floor. Why not years ago?

The reverse side of the argument is if house prices fall, turn on the money spigot!
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users