Simple and Sustainable Forums: ACT property industry most pessimistic - Simple and Sustainable Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ACT property industry most pessimistic oversupplied Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   zaph 

  • Inimitable
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 2,586
  • Joined: 23-November 09

Posted 12 January 2012 - 04:28 AM



Quote

New research shows the ACT property industry is the most pessimistic in the country.

The Property Council of Australia's annual property industry confidence survey shows confidence in the Territory fell by 8.1 per cent during the last quarter.

Property Council ACT executive director Catherine Carter says almost half of the Canberra's developers expect weaker growth over the next three months.

She says cuts in the Commonwealth public service are affecting confidence in the property sector.

"In Canberra construction starts, particularly in the commercial office environment, is very dependent on Commonwealth Government employment and Commonwealth Government requirements for buildings," she said.

"But at a federal political level, both of the major political parties have indicated or proposed significant cuts to Commonwealth public service numbers so I think that's what creates uncertainty from a property point of view.




http://www.abc.net.a...056?section=act
0

#2 User is offline   mattau 

  • Consummate
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 201
  • Joined: 15-November 11

Posted 12 January 2012 - 02:54 PM

"Canberra has the highest commercial vacancy rate of any Australian capital city, at almost 14 per cent.About 60 per cent of commercial office buildings in the capital are owned or tenanted by the Commonwealth Government."




That 14% vacancy rate is pretty high for commercial property. yikes!

Perhaps the overdominance of the Cth Govt tenancy has something to do with it. Perhaps not many other private businesses over there to spread the tenancy



0

#3 User is offline   Mr Medved 

  • Inimitable
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 1,642
  • Joined: 26-November 09

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:07 AM

Politically speaking, I was thinking if the federal gubment wanted to cut spending that they only cut jobs in Canberra.

A localised depression in Canberra would not really impact the rest of the country/economy at large, at the same time not cutting jobs in other places would keep national confidence at a higher level. At least that's what I would consider.
0

#4 User is offline   cobran20 

  • Inimitable
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 4,031
  • Joined: 13-November 09

Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:50 AM

View PostMr Medved, on 13 January 2012 - 02:07 AM, said:

Politically speaking, I was thinking if the federal gubment wanted to cut spending that they only cut jobs in Canberra.

A localised depression in Canberra would not really impact the rest of the country/economy at large, at the same time not cutting jobs in other places would keep national confidence at a higher level. At least that's what I would consider.


... and if they got rid of State governments, the savings would put the country into a big surplus and vastly more efficient and streamlined. :thumbsup:

But fat chance on that one. :(
0

#5 User is offline   staringclown 

  • I am spartacus!
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 4,184
  • Joined: 04-October 09
  • LocationCanberra

Posted 14 January 2012 - 12:29 AM

I keep asking for voluntary redundancy but they won't have it. :drool: I'm not a big enough dud apparently.

Is this false advertising? This chump has an ad for a house and land package on allhomes for $399999. I thought yeehah! - I'll take it. Follow the link and you find the package is $689000. The block only is 400K. And he's trying to sell it at "cost + incurred costs".

They do leave a lovely little quote at the end of the ad.

Quote

“In Real Estate, history depicts, bad decisions in hind side aren’t made through bad decisions, but rather made through indecision!” Act now!!!


bad decisions aren't made through bad decisions? :wacko:

"hind side" == arse? Which I think is what he is talking out of.
0

#6 User is offline   zaph 

  • Inimitable
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 2,586
  • Joined: 23-November 09

Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:15 AM

View Poststaringclown, on 14 January 2012 - 12:29 AM, said:

I keep asking for voluntary redundancy but they won't have it. :drool: I'm not a big enough dud apparently.

Is this false advertising? This chump has an ad for a house and land package on allhomes for $399999. I thought yeehah! - I'll take it. Follow the link and you find the package is $689000. The block only is 400K. And he's trying to sell it at "cost + incurred costs".

They do leave a lovely little quote at the end of the ad.



bad decisions aren't made through bad decisions? :wacko:

"hind side" == arse? Which I think is what he is talking out of.


but you get a "EER6", isn't that the latest top end BMW? you should buy it.
0

#7 User is offline   staringclown 

  • I am spartacus!
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced members
  • Posts: 4,184
  • Joined: 04-October 09
  • LocationCanberra

Posted 14 January 2012 - 01:36 AM

View Postzaph, on 14 January 2012 - 01:15 AM, said:

but you get a "EER6", isn't that the latest top end BMW? you should buy it.


I thought it stood for "enjoy equity retrospectively" in 6 months. :)
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users